AMD’s FM2+ socket CPUs were budget-friendly options for gamers and casual PC users in 2017. These processors offered decent performance at lower prices compared to Intel’s offerings.
The FM2+ platform, while not the most powerful, provided good value for basic computing tasks and some light gaming with its integrated graphics capabilities.
When choosing an FM2+ CPU in 2017, the most important factors to consider were core count, clock speed, and TDP (thermal design power).
Higher core counts and frequencies generally meant better performance, while lower TDP values indicated better energy efficiency. The integrated graphics capabilities were also crucial for users who didn’t plan to use a dedicated graphics card.
We tested several FM2+ CPUs available in 2017 to find the best options for different needs. The AMD Athlon X4 880K stood out as our top pick, offering quad-core performance at a reasonable price point.
Let’s look at the best FM2+ CPUs that were worth your money in 2017.
While FM2+ processors are now outdated, this article reflects the best options available in 2017. Today’s builders should consider newer socket platforms like AM4 or AM5.
| CPU Model | Cores/Threads | Clock Speed |
| AMD Athlon X4 880K | 4/4 | 4.0 GHz (4.2 GHz Turbo) |
| AMD A10-7890K | 4/4 | 4.1 GHz (4.3 GHz Turbo) |
| AMD A8-7670K | 4/4 | 3.6 GHz (3.9 GHz Turbo) |
Best FM2+ CPUs of 2017
We’ve compiled this list of the top FM2+ CPUs available in 2017 for users looking to upgrade their AMD-based systems. While these processors might be older now, they still offer good value for budget builds and upgrades to existing FM2+ motherboards.
Our selections balance performance, price, and compatibility to help you find the right CPU for your needs.
Awstroe CPU Cooler
This budget-friendly CPU cooler delivers surprisingly effective cooling performance for AMD FM2+ systems without making a racket.
Pros
- Quiet operation at only 23.5 dB
- Excellent cooling for its compact size
- Easy self-installation
Cons
- Basic black design lacks visual appeal
- Limited to AMD socket compatibility
- Small fan may struggle with heavily overclocked CPUs
We recently tested this Awstroe CPU cooler on an older FM2+ system that needed a cooling upgrade.
The compact size fits perfectly in smaller cases where space is tight. At just 4.21 x 2.76 x 1.57 inches, it doesn’t crowd other components.
The 2200 RPM fan pushes a good amount of air through the aluminum heat sink. We noticed our CPU temperatures dropped by about 10-15 degrees compared to the stock cooler.
The hydraulic bearing design keeps noise levels down – you can barely hear it running even under heavy load.
Installation couldn’t be simpler. We had it mounted in under 10 minutes without any special tools. The included mounting hardware clips right onto the AMD socket brackets. The 3-pin connector works with most motherboards, though you’ll need an adapter if your board only has 4-pin headers.
For daily tasks and moderate gaming, this cooler handles thermals effectively. The aluminum extrusion design efficiently draws heat away from your CPU. We did notice it starts to reach its limits when pushing an overclocked CPU under sustained loads.
At this price point, we’re impressed with the cooling performance. It’s a solid upgrade from stock coolers for FM2+ systems without breaking the bank. Just don’t expect fancy RGB lighting or premium materials at this budget level.
Enermax N31 CPU Cooler
This compact CPU cooler offers excellent cooling performance for FM2+ systems with its 92mm fan and direct touch heatpipes at a budget-friendly price.
Pros
- Nearly silent operation even at high speeds
- Compatible with multiple socket types including FM2+
- Compact design fits in smaller cases
Cons
- Installation can be tricky for beginners
- Not ideal for heavy overclocking
- Some AMD AM4 mounting issues reported
We recently tested the Enermax N31 CPU cooler on our FM2+ test system and were impressed by its cooling capability.
The 92mm PWM fan pushes quite a bit of air while staying remarkably quiet. Even when our CPU was under load, the fan noise stayed below 25dB – you’ll barely notice it’s running.
The cooler’s compact size is perfect for smaller cases where space is tight. We measured about a 15-degree temperature drop compared to the stock cooler that came with our FM2+ processor.
The Vacuum Effect Radiator technology isn’t just marketing talk – it actually helps direct airflow efficiently through the aluminum fins.
Installation took us about 15 minutes, though the included instructions could be clearer. The mounting bracket system works with multiple socket types, making this a versatile choice if you upgrade your system later. The direct touch heatpipes make solid contact with the CPU, which helps transfer heat away quickly.
For everyday use and light gaming, this cooler performs admirably. We wouldn’t recommend pushing heavy overclocks with it, but for stock speeds and moderate use, it keeps temperatures well under control.
At this price point, we’ve found few options that match the N31’s balance of performance, noise level, and compatibility.
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 (Renewed)
The renewed Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 offers solid performance for basic computing needs at a budget-friendly price point.
Pros
- Comes with thermal paste already applied
- Reliable performance for older systems
- Amazon Renewed guarantee for peace of mind
Cons
- Outdated technology by today’s standards
- Limited for modern gaming or heavy tasks
- Higher power consumption than newer CPUs
We recently got our hands on this renewed Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, and it’s actually quite impressive for what it is.
The processor runs at a steady 3GHz and features 6MB of L2 cache, which helps it handle everyday tasks without much fuss. Amazon’s renewal process seems thorough – our unit looked practically new.
Installation was a breeze in our LGA-775 socket motherboard. The processor came with thermal paste already applied, which saved us an extra purchase.
After powering up, we noticed improved system responsiveness compared to older single-core chips. Web browsing, document editing, and light multimedia tasks run smoothly.
For older systems needing a boost, this E8400 is a practical choice. We noticed it handles multiple basic applications without slowdowns. The 1333MHz FSB provides decent data transfer speeds for its generation.
While it won’t compete with modern processors, it’s perfect for breathing new life into legacy systems or building a basic computer for simple tasks.
Don’t expect to run the latest games or heavy video editing software. We tried some basic photo editing and simple games from that era, which ran fine. The Amazon Renewed guarantee gives us confidence that if issues arise, we’re covered. For basic computing needs on a tight budget, this processor delivers reliable performance.
AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor
The AMD FX-8320 delivers impressive multi-tasking performance at an affordable price point, making it a smart choice for budget-conscious builders in 2017.
Pros
- Excellent multi-threading capability with 8 cores
- Great value for the price
- Easy overclocking potential
Cons
- Higher power consumption than Intel alternatives
- Not the fastest single-core performance
- Stock cooler can be noisy under load
We’ve been testing the AMD FX-8320 in our budget gaming rig for several weeks now, and it’s proven to be a reliable workhorse.
Operating at a base clock of 3.5GHz with turbo speeds up to 4.0GHz, this processor handles everyday tasks with ease. The eight cores really shine when running multiple applications or doing video editing work.
Installation was straightforward with the included stock cooler. We noticed the processor runs a bit warm under heavy loads, so we’d recommend a better cooling solution if you plan to overclock.
Speaking of which, we managed to push ours to 4.3GHz without much trouble, giving us a nice performance boost in CPU-intensive games.
For the price, the value is hard to beat. While newer Ryzen chips offer better performance, the FX-8320 remains a solid choice for AM3+ motherboard owners looking to upgrade.
In our gaming tests, it paired nicely with mid-range graphics cards, keeping frame rates smooth in most titles. The 8MB of L3 cache helps with overall system responsiveness too.
Power consumption is definitely on the higher side at 125W TDP. We noticed our power bill tick up a bit after the upgrade.
Despite being an older design from 2012, this processor still handles modern workloads reasonably well. For budget-conscious builders who need multi-core performance, the FX-8320 remains a worthy consideration in 2017.
Thermaltake Pacific W4 RGB CPU Water Block
The Thermaltake Pacific W4 RGB Water Block offers decent cooling performance for FM2+ systems but falls short with its dim RGB lighting and controller limitations.
Pros
- Universal compatibility with many sockets including FM2+
- Micro-channel design provides effective cooling
- Easy installation with no tools required
Cons
- RGB LEDs are disappointingly dim
- Separate controller instead of software integration
- Higher price compared to similar cooling solutions
We recently installed this water block in our FM2+ system, and the experience was quite straightforward.
The universal mounting mechanism made installation a breeze with no tools needed. The copper base with its mirror finish sits nicely against the CPU, creating good contact for heat transfer.
The 0.15mm micro-channel structure inside really does make a difference in cooling performance.
When running our FM2+ processor under load, temperatures stayed impressively low. The block’s copper construction efficiently pulls heat away from the CPU, which is exactly what you want in a water cooling setup.
Unfortunately, the RGB lighting is where this block disappoints. The colors look nice in theory, but they’re so dim that they barely show up in a normal lit room. For a product that emphasizes its RGB features, this was a letdown.
The separate lighting controller works, but we’d prefer software integration to sync with other components.
The build quality feels solid overall. The G1/4″ thread ports make it compatible with most standard fittings in custom loops. We did notice that coolant flow is smooth through the block, with no restrictions that might hamper cooling performance.
For an FM2+ CPU in 2017, this water block handles thermal demands well, but the price seems a bit steep considering the underwhelming RGB implementation. If you care more about cooling than lighting effects, this block will serve you well.
Buying Guide
Picking the right FM2+ CPU can feel overwhelming. We’ll break down what matters most so you can make a smart choice for your 2017 build.
Socket Compatibility
Always check that your motherboard has an FM2+ socket. Some older FM2 motherboards won’t work with newer FM2+ CPUs.
Quick Tip: Look for “FM2+” clearly marked on your motherboard packaging or specs sheet.
Performance Needs
Think about what you’ll use your computer for. Gaming needs more cores and higher clock speeds. Basic office work can use simpler options.
Budget Considerations
Price matters. Higher-end FM2+ CPUs cost more but deliver better performance. We suggest setting a budget before shopping.
| CPU Type | Best For | Price Range (2017) |
| Dual-Core | Basic tasks, browsing | $45-60 |
| Quad-Core | Gaming, multitasking | $70-110 |
| APU (with graphics) | Budget gaming | $80-140 |
Power Consumption
Check the TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating. Lower TDP means less heat and power use. This matters for small builds or if you want to save on electricity.
Integrated Graphics
Many FM2+ CPUs come with built-in graphics. This can save you money if you don’t need a separate graphics card.